Skip to content

Septic Arthritis / DVT / Tumour — the hot, swollen, or unexplained limb

Prefer to watch? 5-minute lesson13 slides · same content, shorter

1 · SNAPSHOT

Septic Arthritis / DVT / Tumour — the hot, swollen, or unexplained limb body chart
Illustrative, not diagnostic. Canva body chart for Septic Arthritis / DVT / Tumour — the hot, swollen, or unexplained limb.

This entire page is free, permanently — all seven sections. Red flag content is never gated in CliniStudy.

Who: Anyone. There is no demographic that protects them, though the risk sets differ for each of the three.
What: Infection in a joint · a clot in a deep vein · a primary or secondary bone or soft-tissue tumour.
How it behaves: Too hot, too swollen, too painful for what happened to it — or too persistent at night, in a limb nothing mechanical explains.

The one thing to take from this page:

You are not deciding which of the three it is. You are deciding whether this behaves like load-sensitive musculoskeletal pain — and if it doesn't, it gets seen today.

The three doorsThe feature that opens it
Septic arthritisHot, red, swollen joint, exquisitely painful on minimal movement, systemic features
DVTUnilateral calf or whole-leg swelling, girth asymmetry, and a risk set
Tumour / metastasisPersistent night and rest pain, weight loss, prior cancer, unexplained mass

All three doors open onto the same corridor: same-day medical assessment. You do not have to know which one it was before you refer.

⚠️ No Australian guideline governs the septic-joint decision. The DVT limb has the THANZ guideline [22], and the bone-tumour limb has the national optimal care pathway for sarcoma (Cancer Australia), which lists the warning symptoms and sends suspected bone sarcoma for an X-ray and to a specialist sarcoma team. Anchored to the Scandinavian SANJO guideline for septic arthritis [1], the American Society of Hematology VTE diagnosis guideline [2] with CHEST for management [3], and the GEIS soft-tissue sarcoma guideline [4] alongside the UK bone sarcoma guidelines (Gerrand et al. 2025, not sighted). All are written for the team that receives your referral, not for you making it.

Members

The 5-minute lesson is for members

Twelve slides on this pattern: what you'll hear, what to examine, what to do. Free with an account.

Sign in or join free

Guideline anchor

No Australian guideline covers the septic-joint limb of this triage decision.

More

The bone-tumour limb has the national optimal care pathway for sarcoma (Cancer Australia, 2020), which lists the warning symptoms, including persistent non-mechanical bone pain and nocturnal bone pain, and sends suspected bone sarcoma for an X-ray and to a specialist sarcoma team. The DVT limb has the Thrombosis and Haemostasis Society of Australia and New Zealand VTE guideline (Tran et al. 2019, PMID 30739331), which excludes DVT with a clinical prediction rule plus D-dimer and confirms it with imaging. The septic and sarcoma limbs also keep their non-Australian anchors: SANJO for native-joint septic arthritis (Ravn et al. 2023, PMID 36756304) and the UK bone sarcoma guidelines (Gerrand et al. 2025) with the GEIS soft-tissue sarcoma guideline (García Del Muro et al. 2016, PMID 26563256). ASH 2018 (Lim et al., PMID 30482764) and CHEST (Kearon et al. 2016, PMID 26867832) stay as the international DVT references.

PubMed Source

There is no Australian clinical care standard for the hot swollen joint presenting to physiotherapy. The sarcoma optimal care pathway is written for the whole pathway, from first symptoms to specialist care. THANZ covers DVT diagnosis but is written for the doctor receiving the referral. Every anchor here is written for the medical team that receives the referral, not for the clinician making it. What the physiotherapy decision is anchored to — recognise, stop, escalate, document — comes from the primary evidence and is labelled as such.

Members

The evidence summary is for members

Verified diagnostic accuracy, where the evidence stands and what it doesn't settle. Free with an account.

Sign in or join free

Sources · 19

Show

Every source on this page resolves and title-verifies against PubMed. Newest first.

  1. 2023Ravn et al. (2023). Guideline for management of septic arthritis in native joints (SANJO). Journal of bone and joint infection, 8(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-8-29-2023
  2. 2018Lim et al. (2018). American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Blood advances, 2(22), 3226-3256. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024828
  3. 2016Kearon et al. (2016). Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest, 149(2), 315-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2015.11.026
  4. 2016Garcia del Muro et al. (2016). Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with soft tissue sarcoma by the Spanish group for research in sarcomas (GEIS). Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 77(1), 133-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2809-5
  5. 1997Wells et al. (1997). Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet (London, England), 350(9094), 1795-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08140-3
  6. 2003Schutgens et al. (2003). The usefulness of five D-dimer assays in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 1(5), 976-81. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00148.x
  7. 2006Scarvelis & Wells (2006). Diagnosis and treatment of deep-vein thrombosis. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 175(9), 1087-92. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060366
  8. 2007Mathews et al. (2007). Management of septic arthritis: a systematic review. Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 66(4), 440-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2006.058909
  9. 2007Margaretten et al. (2007). Does this adult patient have septic arthritis?. JAMA, 297(13), 1478-88. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.13.1478
  10. 2008Mathews & Coakley (2008). Septic arthritis: current diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm. Current opinion in rheumatology, 20(4), 457-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283036975
  11. 2011Carpenter et al. (2011). Evidence-based diagnostics: adult septic arthritis. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 18(8), 781-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01121.x
  12. 2014Geersing et al. (2014). Exclusion of deep vein thrombosis using the Wells rule in clinically important subgroups: individual patient data meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 348, g1340. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1340
  13. 2015Crago & Brennan (2015). Principles in Management of Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Advances in surgery, 49(1), 107-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yasu.2015.04.002
  14. 2016Cheville et al. (2016). Imaging and Clinical Characteristics Predict Near-Term Disablement From Bone Metastases: Implications for Rehabilitation. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 97(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.09.011
  15. 2016Plant & Cannon (2016). Diagnostic work up and recognition of primary bone tumours: a review. EFORT open reviews, 1(6), 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.1.000035
  16. 2019Lunkiewicz et al. (2019). Practical Input on Bone Tumor Imaging: Pathological Fracture, Risk Features, and When to Contact Orthopaedics. Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology, 23(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675804
  17. 2020Elsissy et al. (2020). Bacterial Septic Arthritis of the Adult Native Knee Joint: A Review. JBJS reviews, 8(1), e0059. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00059
  18. 2020Chan et al. (2020). Septic Arthritis: An Evidence-Based Review of Diagnosis and Image-Guided Aspiration. AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 215(3), 568-581. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.22773
  19. 2023Gotta et al. (2023). Unveiling the diagnostic enigma of D-dimer testing in cancer patients: Current evidence and areas of application. European journal of clinical investigation, 53(10), e14060. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14060

Did this page do its job?

CliniStudy is in beta. One tap is enough — it decides what gets fixed first.