Skip to content

Syndesmotic (High Ankle) Sprain

Prefer to watch? 5-minute lesson13 slides · same content, shorter

1 · SNAPSHOT

Syndesmotic (High Ankle) Sprain body chart
Illustrative, not diagnostic. Canva body chart for Syndesmotic (High Ankle) Sprain.

Who: Contact and cutting sports. Football, rugby, skiing, basketball, handball.
What: Pain above the joint line, after a forced dorsiflexion-and-external-rotation moment.
How it behaves: Worse on push-off, cutting and pivoting. Often less swollen than the pain suggests.

The one thing to take from this page:

It travels with the lateral sprain rather than competing with it — and the fork that matters, stable versus unstable, cannot be made clinically.

FindingFigure
Anterior syndesmosis injury on 3-T MRI within 10 days of an acute ligamentous ankle injury38%
Lateral ligament injury in the same 171 injuries73%
Cartilage or osteochondral lesion14%
Syndesmotic sprains as a proportion of ankle sprains, 20,336 person-years6.7% (4.8 per 1,000 person-years)
Athletics as a share of syndesmotic sprains81%

([1], 166 athletes [2], US Military Academy.)

The 38% figure is already on the chronic ankle instability page. Same source, same number.

⚠️ No Australian guideline exists for syndesmotic injury. And that is verified, not asserted — an AGREE II appraisal of every ankle-sprain guideline found them only for lateral ankle ligament sprain and none for syndesmotic injury. Anchored to the ESSKA-AFAS consensus pair (2016), Level IV, whose management half rests on four non-surgical and two surgical studies.

Pattern > Label. "High ankle sprain" names a location. Stable or unstable names the decision.

Members

The 5-minute lesson is for members

Twelve slides on this pattern: what you'll hear, what to examine, what to do. Free with an account.

Sign in or join free

Guideline anchor

No Australian guideline for this presentation.

More

Anchored to ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines on acute isolated syndesmotic injury — classification and diagnosis (van Dijk et al., PMID 26704800) paired with conservative and surgical management (PMID 26846658)

PubMed

An AGREE II appraisal of every ankle-sprain guideline found them only for LATERAL ankle ligament sprain — Netherlands, USA, Canada and Australia (nursing) — and NONE for syndesmotic injury (Green et al. 2019, PMID 31470826). But the clinical accuracy data on this page IS Australian: Sman (University of Sydney, nine clinics) and Alonso (Bankstown NSW physiotherapists).

Members

The evidence summary is for members

Verified diagnostic accuracy, where the evidence stands and what it doesn't settle. Free with an account.

Sign in or join free

Sources · 26

Show

Every source on this page resolves and title-verifies against PubMed. Newest first.

  1. 2025Baltes et al. (2025). The Prevalence, Size, and Anatomic Location of Cartilage and Osteochondral Lesions in Athletes With an Acute Ligamentous Ankle Injury. The American journal of sports medicine, 53(9), 2173-2180. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251344187
  2. 2011Waterman et al. (2011). Risk factors for syndesmotic and medial ankle sprain: role of sex, sport, and level of competition. The American journal of sports medicine, 39(5), 992-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510391462
  3. 2015Sman et al. (2015). Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for ankle syndesmosis injury. British journal of sports medicine, 49(5), 323-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092787
  4. 2016Calder et al. (2016). Stable Versus Unstable Grade II High Ankle Sprains: A Prospective Study Predicting the Need for Surgical Stabilization and Time to Return to Sports. Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 32(4), 634-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.10.003
  5. 2003Bachmann et al. (2003). Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 326(7386), 417. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7386.417
  6. 2018Kellett et al. (2018). Diagnostic imaging of ankle syndesmosis injuries: A general review. Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology, 62(2), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12708
  7. 2021Corte-Real & Caetano (2021). Ankle and syndesmosis instability: consensus and controversies. EFORT open reviews, 6(6), 420-431. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210017
  8. 2006Lin et al. (2006). Ankle syndesmosis injuries: anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and intervention. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 36(6), 372-84. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2006.2195
  9. 2016van Dijk et al. (2016). Classification and diagnosis of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 24(4), 1200-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3942-8
  10. 2016van Dijk et al. (2016). Conservative and surgical management of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 24(4), 1217-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4017-1
  11. 2019Green et al. (2019). What is the quality of clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute lateral ankle ligament sprains in adults? A systematic review. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 20(1), 394. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2750-6
  12. 2013Sman et al. (2013). Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for diagnosis of ankle syndesmosis injury: a systematic review. British journal of sports medicine, 47(10), 620-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-091702
  13. 2021Netterström-Wedin & Bleakley (2021). Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests assessing ligamentous injury of the ankle syndesmosis: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine, 49, 214-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.03.005
  14. 1998Alonso et al. (1998). Clinical tests for ankle syndesmosis injury: reliability and prediction of return to function. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 27(4), 276-84. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1998.27.4.276
  15. 2011Kellett (2011). The clinical features of ankle syndesmosis injuries: a general review. Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine, 21(6), 524-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0b013e318234be7d
  16. 2022Spindler et al. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the value of the external rotation stress test under fluoroscopy to detect syndesmotic injuries. EFORT open reviews, 7(10), 671-679. https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-22-0037
  17. 2022Ng et al. (2022). Which test is the best? An updated literature review of imaging modalities for acute ankle diastasis injuries. Journal of medical radiation sciences, 69(3), 382-393. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.589
  18. 2022Ashkani Esfahani et al. (2022). Volume measurements on weightbearing computed tomography can detect subtle syndesmotic instability. Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 40(2), 460-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25049
  19. 2022Raheman et al. (2022). Can Weightbearing Cone-beam CT Reliably Differentiate Between Stable and Unstable Syndesmotic Ankle Injuries? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 480(8), 1547-1562. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002171
  20. 2019Hagemeijer et al. (2019). Range of Normal and Abnormal Syndesmotic Measurements Using Weightbearing CT. Foot & ankle international, 40(12), 1430-1437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100719866831
  21. 2003Oae et al. (2003). Injury of the tibiofibular syndesmosis: value of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology, 227(1), 155-61. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2271011865
  22. 2023Bolia et al. (2023). Elite Athletes Successfully Return to the Preinjury Level of Sport Following Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine, 33(1), 90-96. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001019
  23. 2022Salameh et al. (2022). Return to Play After Isolated Syndesmotic Ligamentous Injury in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 7(2), 24730114221096482. https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114221096482
  24. 2019Vancolen et al. (2019). Return to Sport After Ankle Syndesmotic Injury: A Systematic Review. Sports health, 11(2), 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738118816282
  25. 2020D'Hooghe et al. (2020). Return to play after surgery for isolated unstable syndesmotic ankle injuries (West Point grade IIB and III) in 110 male professional football players: a retrospective cohort study. British journal of sports medicine, 54(19), 1168-1173. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100298
  26. 2012Howard et al. (2012). Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of return to play following syndesmosis (high) ankle sprains in professional football players. Sports health, 4(6), 535-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738112462531

Did this page do its job?

CliniStudy is in beta. One tap is enough — it decides what gets fixed first.