Skip to content

Ankylosing Spondylitis / Axial Spondyloarthritis

Prefer to watch? 4-minute lesson13 slides · same content, shorter

1 · SNAPSHOT

Ankylosing Spondylitis / Axial Spondyloarthritis body chart
Illustrative, not diagnostic. Canva body chart for Ankylosing Spondylitis / Axial Spondyloarthritis.

Who: Onset typically under forty. Often described as male-predominant — read the warning below before you use that.
What: Axial spondyloarthritis — covering radiographic axSpA (what "ankylosing spondylitis" described) and non-radiographic axSpA.
How it behaves: Gradual spinal stiffness and pain over three months. Worse in the morning or after rest; eased by movement. Alternating buttock or posterior thigh pain. May report fatigue or systemic symptoms — eye, bowel, skin.

The one thing to take from this page:

The pattern is reversed. Mechanical back pain is worse with activity and better with rest; this is worse with rest and better with movement. That single question is what shortens a delay measured in years — and physiotherapists ask it before rheumatologists get the chance.

The reverse pattern

Mechanical back painInflammatory back pain
ActivityWorseBetter
RestBetterWorse
MorningVariableStiff, and it takes time to ease
NightPosition-relatedSecond half of the night, gets them up
DurationAny>3 months
Age at onsetAnyUsually <40

⚠️ Two warnings. "Male predominance" is a historical description, not a screening rule — diagnostic delay has been examined for sex bias. And the ASAS criteria are classification criteria for research cohorts, not diagnostic criteria.

Members

The 4-minute lesson is for members

Twelve slides on this pattern: what you'll hear, what to examine, what to do. Free with an account.

Sign in or join free

Guideline anchor

No Australian guideline for physiotherapy management. The one Australian guideline, the ARA/ANZMUSC Australian Living Guideline for the Pharmacological Management of Inflammatory Arthritis, covers axial SpA but only drug treatment, for prescribers.

More

Anchored to the ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis, 2022 update (Ramiro et al. 2023, PMID 36270658) — a genuine international guideline, which is unusual for these patterns — with the systematic literature review of non-pharmacological and non-biological interventions that informed them (Ortolan et al. 2023, PMID 36261247). Diagnostic framing from the ASAS classification criteria (Rudwaleit et al. 2009, PMID 19297344) and the inflammatory back pain criteria (Sieper et al. 2009, PMID 19147614).

PubMed Source

The ASAS-EULAR recommendations are a real management guideline and are cited as such. They are not Australian. Note also that the ASAS criteria are classification criteria for research cohorts — they are not diagnostic criteria and should not be applied as though they were.

Members

The evidence summary is for members

Verified diagnostic accuracy, where the evidence stands and what it doesn't settle. Free with an account.

Sign in or join free

Sources · 20

Show

Every source on this page resolves and title-verifies against PubMed. Newest first.

  1. 2009Sieper et al. (2009). New criteria for inflammatory back pain in patients with chronic back pain: a real patient exercise by experts from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS). Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 68(6), 784-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.101501
  2. 2026Avcu et al. (2026). Inflammatory back pain-like symptoms and MRI mimics of sacroiliitis in patients with anatomical variants of the sacroiliac joint: a cross-sectional study. Rheumatology international, 46(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-026-06121-4
  3. 2024Ullrich et al. (2024). Inflammatory Back Pain and Psoriasis: Expecting Spondyloarthritis, Discovering Lymphoma. Cureus, 16(6), e61593. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.61593
  4. 2026Alexandrov et al. (2026). Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis. International journal of rheumatic diseases, 29(4), e70637. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.70637
  5. 2009Rudwaleit et al. (2009). The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 68(6), 777-83. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.108233
  6. 2024Radny et al. (2024). Learning imaging in axial spondyloarthritis: more than just a matter of experience. RMD open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003944
  7. 2024Zimba et al. (2024). Diagnosis, monitoring, and management of axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatology international, 44(8), 1395-1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05615-3
  8. 2025Demeter et al. (2025). Diagnosis and management of axial spondyloarthritis. JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, 38(11), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000263
  9. 2023Ramiro et al. (2023). ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis: 2022 update. Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 82(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2022-223296
  10. 2023Ortolan et al. (2023). Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological and non-biological interventions: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 82(1), 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2022-223297
  11. 2025Zhang et al. (2025). Effects of Exercise Therapy in Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression of Randomized Trials. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 106(1), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2024.06.005
  12. 2024Wang et al. (2024). Efficacy and safety of mind-body exercise for patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 19(1), 586. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05072-5
  13. 2025Ertem (2025). Ankylosing spondylitis and kinesiophobia. PeerJ, 13, e19034. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19034
  14. 2026Somer et al. (2026). Sexual function in axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 65(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf578
  15. 2025Williams et al. (2025). The comparative prevalence of comorbidities across rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatology advances in practice, 9(4), rkaf121. https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkaf121
  16. 2025Poddubnyy & Baraliakos (2025). Understanding the causes of treatment failure is crucial for the management of axial spondyloarthritis. Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 21(6), 309-311. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-025-01254-5
  17. 2021Zhao et al. (2021). Diagnostic delay in axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 60(4), 1620-1628. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa807
  18. 2024Bandinelli et al. (2024). Sex Bias in Diagnostic Delay: Are Axial Spondyloarthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis Still Phantom Diseases in Women? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of personalized medicine, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14010091
  19. 2025Bittar & Deodhar (2025). Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Review. JAMA, 333(5), 408-420. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.20917
  20. 2025Navarro-Compán et al. (2025). Axial spondyloarthritis. Lancet (London, England), 405(10473), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02263-3

Did this page do its job?

CliniStudy is in beta. One tap is enough — it decides what gets fixed first.