1 · SNAPSHOT

Who: Anyone with a sustained-position load and a life. Students, desk workers, drivers, new parents, tradies who hold one position.
What: Diffuse, dull, bilateral or central ache across neck / upper trapezius / interscapular region. A smear on the body chart, not a spot.
How it behaves: Aggs: sustained positions — screens, driving, study, holding a phone up. Builds through the day. Eases: movement, changing position, stretching, heat. Settles in minutes.
The one thing to take from this page:
The body chart makes this diagnosis. The objective exam only tells you how irritable it is. This is a pattern of exclusion, ruled in on the subjective and confirmed by an exam that finds nothing sinister.
| Finding | Figure |
|---|---|
| Age-standardised point prevalence | 3,551.1 per 100,000 (95% UI 3,139.5–3,977.9) |
| Incidence | 806.6 (713.7–912.5) · YLD 352.0 (245.6–493.3) |
| Change in that burden, 1990 → 2017 | none that was significant |
| Pain at onset → 6.5 weeks → 12 months (0–100) | 64 → 35 → 42 |
| Disability at onset → 6.5 weeks → 12 months | 30 → 17 → 17, flat |
([1], GBD systematic analysis [2], seven pooled inception cohorts, Level I, Australian first author.)
⚠️ No Australian guideline for this presentation; anchored to the JOSPT Neck Pain: Revision 2017 [3]. ACSQHC has a Low Back Pain Clinical Care Standard and a Knee Osteoarthritis Clinical Care Standard. There is no neck equivalent, and RACGP publishes none. And read the anchor honestly: the guideline is 83 pages, paywalled, its PubMed record carries no results abstract, and it was not read in this pass. It is named here. Nothing on this page is quoted from it.
Pattern > Label. "Postural syndrome" names a posture that four measured studies say isn't the problem. A diffuse, position-dependent, movement-easing neck with a clean neurological screen names the pattern.
2 · SE — THE SUBJECTIVE PATTERN (the 70%)
The 70/30 applies harder here than anywhere. By the time you've finished the five stages you have already ruled every competing pattern in or out. The P/E confirms irritability and hands you asterisk signs. It does not make the call.
Five stages, in your course's order.
MAIN PROBLEM
"My neck's just always tight. It's worse by the end of the day and I feel it across my shoulders."
No incident. No moment. A description of a load over time, not an injury.
BODY CHART
This is where the work happens. Draw it, then read it against the list — the body chart discriminates before you touch anyone.
| What you draw | What it points at |
|---|---|
| Midline or bilateral, diffuse, neck → upper trap → interscapular | Mechanical neck pain — this pattern |
| Unilateral, non-midline, ± scapular referral | PIV joint |
| Deep central, worse the day after loading | Cervical discogenic |
| Below the shoulder, dermatomal ± paraesthesia | Cervical radicular |
| Suboccipital → frontal / temporal | Cervicogenic headache — or migraine (§3) |
Record P1 (the diffuse ache) and any P2 separately. Mark φp where it is genuinely pain-free. If you cannot draw a spot, that is a finding, not a failure.
BEHAVIOUR
- Coding: most of these are M or Is — morning stiffness <30 min = M, >30 min = In. A neck that is stiff for two hours every morning is not this pattern, and you go looking for something inflammatory.
- 24-hour pattern: best on waking, worst at 4pm. That trajectory is the pattern. The reverse trajectory isn't.
- Severity: VAS 0–10 at best / at worst / right now.
- Irritability — all three parts. Resting symptoms (usually none) + vigour of the provoking activity (a sustained position, not one movement) + time to settle (minutes, on moving). Low irritability here buys you a full P/E and a loading plan on day one.
HISTORY
Insidious. No trauma, no single mechanism. The change is usually in workload, sleep, training volume or life stress — not in a movement.
Three questions with prospective data behind them, which is more than most of what gets asked:
| Ask | Because |
|---|---|
| "How are you sleeping?" | Low sleep quality, OR 1.76 (95% CI 1.17–2.63) for developing neck pain over 12 months |
| "How much are you moving?" | Insufficient physical activity, OR 2.41 (1.03–5.65), same cohort |
| "What are you worried this is?" | Catastrophising and psychological distress predicted persistence and recurrence |
([4], 396 of 457 pain-free adults followed 12 months [5], six prospective cohorts, low-to-moderate certainty. Very-low-certainty support for the activity question across 20,350 participants in [6]; take the direction, not an effect size.)
What not to spend the subjective on: how they sit at their desk, their pillow, their monitor height, how much they're on their phone. Measured cervical flexion angle during phone use did not raise the odds of developing neck pain — standing OR 1.0 (95% CI 0.97–1.04), sitting OR 1.01 (0.98–1.04) (Correia et al. 2025) — and did not associate with prevalence (OR 1.00, 0.98–1.02, p=0.66), frequency or intensity in 582 adults [7].
Ask about it if it's their belief. Then treat it as a belief, not as a cause.
SPECIAL / SCREENING QUESTIONS
Clear, all of them, or this isn't the pattern:
- 5 D's and 3 N's — dizziness, diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, drop attacks; nausea, nystagmus, numbness.
- UMN symptoms — clumsy hands, dropping things, gait change, bladder change.
- Dermatomal or myotomal symptoms below the shoulder.
- Systemically unwell, unexplained weight loss, night pain that wakes and won't settle with position.
- Trauma of any kind → §4, and the Canadian C-Spine Rule.
Assessing this region? Download the Cervical Spine assessment template →
3 · HYPOTHESIS RANKING
Top three, one discriminating feature each. Rule the dangerous ones out first (§4), then discriminate on the body chart.
| Rank | Pattern | The one discriminating feature |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | PIV joint dysfunction | Unilateral, non-midline local pain ± scapular referral, reproduced by unilateral PAIVMs at one level with a comparable sign. Mechanical neck pain is diffuse and won't localise to a level. |
| 2 | Cervical discogenic | Deep central ache worse the day after heavy lifting or sustained flexion; eased by unloading or gentle extension. Mechanical neck pain builds within the day and eases with movement. |
| 3 | Cervical radiculopathy | Symptoms below the shoulder in a dermatomal pattern ± paraesthesia or myotomal weakness. Wainner's 4-item cluster gives a +LR point estimate of 30.3 — on 82 patients, with wide CIs the authors flag themselves and call for validation [8]. |
And the headache branch, because students get this one backwards.
- Cervicogenic headache — headache reproduced by cervical movement or palpation, with restricted upper cervical rotation. The cervical flexion-rotation test is the discriminator: Se 83.0% (95% CI 70–92), Sp 83.0% (71–91), +LR 5.0 (2.6–9.5), −LR 0.2 (0.1–0.4), moderate certainty, 4 studies / 182 participants [9]. Every other history item and clinical finding in that review: accuracy remains unclear.
- Migraine with neck pain — throbbing, 4–72 hours, unilateral, ± aura, nausea, photophobia.
Read this number twice. Neck pain is present in 77.0% (95% CI 69.0–86.4) of migraine patients versus 23.2% (18.6–28.5) of non-headache controls — 87.0% (77.0–93.0) in chronic migraine [10]. A stiff, tender neck in a headache patient tells you close to nothing, because three quarters of migraineurs have one. Finding it does not make the headache cervical.
The two that aren't a neck problem at all live in §4: cervical arterial dysfunction (CAD page) and cervical myelopathy (myelopathy page).
4 · RED FLAGS — DON'T MISS THIS
Free forever. Safety is never gated in CliniStudy, and it never will be.
Screen it even though the screen isn't validated — and know which of those two things you're doing
29 clinical practice guidelines. Only 12 listed red flags at all, giving 114 of them. Median Fleiss' kappa between guidelines = 0 — no agreement. The authors state that specific recommendations cannot be provided, and that the flags are "mainly supported by expert opinions" [11]. One exception survived: the Canadian C-Spine Rule for post-traumatic fracture.
So: we screen because the consequence of missing it is catastrophic, not because the screen is validated. Say that out loud instead of teaching a list as fact.
The vascular pattern
Unilateral, severe, poorly responsive to analgesics, radiating to head / limb / shoulder, and it does not behave mechanically. In 58 pooled cases of vertebral artery dissection: 63.8% female, mean age 36.8, neurological symptoms in about two-thirds, and half had no identifiable cause of onset — a third followed trauma or a sudden movement [12]. The authors' own conclusion: the clinical utility of red flags for VAD remains uncertain.
Plus the 5 D's and 3 N's. Full pathway on the CAD page — that page is free too.
The cord
Any UMN sign — clumsy hands, dropping things, gait change, ↑ reflexes, +ve Hoffmann, bladder change. Mechanical neck pain has a ✓✓ / NAD neurological screen. Full pathway on the myelopathy page.
Post-trauma
Canadian C-Spine Rule. The only red-flag instrument a systematic review of guidelines could actually recommend (Feller et al. 2024).
The ordinary ones, still
- Systemically unwell, fever, unexplained weight loss.
- Night pain that wakes and won't settle with position change.
- Progressive neurological deficit of any kind.
- History of cancer, or of significant immunosuppression.
Why the screen comes before the treatment, not after it
334 case reports of serious adverse events after conservative neck procedures. Only 176 (53%) carried enough information to judge — and of those, 153/176 (87%) looked potentially preventable: 55 came down to inappropriate patient selection (12 missed diagnosis, 20 missed risk factors, 23 missed contraindications) and 67 to inappropriate treatment, 41 of those improper technique. Forty of the cases occurred in the last decade ([13], Australian authors).
And be honest about what that is. 176 of 334 case reports, with no denominator. It is not an adverse-event rate and you must not quote it as one. It is an argument about selection.
Don't manipulate a neck you haven't screened. If you cannot say why this is mechanical, you have not finished the subjective.
5 · OE — THE OBJECTIVE (the 30%)
Members
Sections 5 to 7 are for members
The objective exam, management and pearls, plus the six-minute lesson and the debrief. Free with an account.
Sign in or join free6 · MX — MANAGEMENT ESSENTIALS
Members
Sections 5 to 7 are for members
The objective exam, management and pearls, plus the six-minute lesson and the debrief. Free with an account.
Sign in or join free7 · CLINICAL PEARLS + RETRIEVAL CHECK
Members
Sections 5 to 7 are for members
The objective exam, management and pearls, plus the six-minute lesson and the debrief. Free with an account.
Sign in or join freeMembers
The 4-minute lesson is for members
Twelve slides on this pattern: what you'll hear, what to examine, what to do. Free with an account.
Sign in or join freeGuideline anchor
No Australian guideline for this presentation. Anchored to Neck Pain: Revision 2017 (Blanpied et al. 2017, PMID 28666405) - APTA Orthopaedic Section / JOSPT, ICF-based.
More
Confirmed 1 Sep 2026 as the current JOSPT revision; a PubMed search of neck-pain guidelines 2019-2026 returned no later one.
No Australian guideline exists for non-specific / mechanical neck pain. ACSQHC publishes a Low Back Pain Clinical Care Standard and an Osteoarthritis of the Knee Clinical Care Standard; there is no neck equivalent. RACGP publishes none. The anchor is international.
Members
The evidence summary is for members
Verified diagnostic accuracy, where the evidence stands and what it doesn't settle. Free with an account.
Sign in or join freeSources · 26
ShowHide
Every source on this page resolves and title-verifies against PubMed. Newest first.
- 2020Safiri et al. (2020). Global, regional, and national burden of neck pain in the general population, 1990-2017: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 368, m791. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m791
- 2011Hush et al. (2011). Prognosis of acute idiopathic neck pain is poor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 92(5), 824-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.025
- 2017Blanpied et al. (2017). Neck Pain: Revision 2017. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 47(7), A1-A83. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2017.0302
- 2025Correia et al. (2025). Cervical flexion posture during smartphone use was not a risk factor for neck pain, but low sleep quality and insufficient levels of physical activity were. A longitudinal investigation. Brazilian journal of physical therapy, 29(6), 101258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101258
- 2025Yu et al. (2025). Physical and Psychological Predictors for Persistent and Recurrent Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review. European journal of pain (London, England), 29(10), e70168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.70168
- 2022Luc et al. (2022). Relationship Between Leisure Time Physical Activity, Weight, and the Onset and Persistence of Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 52(12), 777-791. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2022.11137
- 2021Correia et al. (2021). Association Between Text Neck and Neck Pain in Adults. Spine, 46(9), 571-578. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003854
- 2003Wainner et al. (2003). Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine, 28(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200301010-00014
- 2022Demont et al. (2022). Cervicogenic headache, an easy diagnosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies. Musculoskeletal science & practice, 62, 102640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102640
- 2022Al-Khazali et al. (2022). Prevalence of neck pain in migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 42(7), 663-673. https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211068073
- 2024Feller et al. (2024). Red flags for potential serious pathologies in people with neck pain: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Archives of physiotherapy, 14, 105-115. https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2024.3245
- 2026Feller et al. (2026). Red flags for extracranial vertebral artery dissections in patients with neck pain: a scoping review. The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2026.2720218
- 2025Leung et al. (2025). Are serious adverse events associated with conservative physical procedures of the neck potentially preventable? A sub-analysis of a systematic review. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 44, 691-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.06.029
- 2018Usunier et al. (2018). Clinical Diagnostic Tests versus Medial Branch Blocks for Adults with Persisting Cervical Zygapophyseal Joint Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada, 70(2), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2016-89.mt
- 2019Hesby et al. (2019). Electronic measures of movement impairment, repositioning, and posture in people with and without neck pain-a systematic review. Systematic reviews, 8(1), 220. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1125-2
- 2025Broisler et al. (2025). Intra- and inter-rater reliability, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change of the cranio-cervical flexion test in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain. Musculoskeletal science & practice, 76, 103258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103258
- 2018Hill et al. (2018). Do findings identified on magnetic resonance imaging predict future neck pain? A systematic review. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 18(5), 880-891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.025
- 2016Richards et al. (2016). Neck Posture Clusters and Their Association With Biopsychosocial Factors and Neck Pain in Australian Adolescents. Physical therapy, 96(10), 1576-1587. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150660
- 2020Wilhelm et al. (2020). The Effects of Exercise Dosage on Neck-Related Pain and Disability: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 50(11), 607-621. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2020.9155
- 2015Gross et al. (2015). Exercises for mechanical neck disorders. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 1(1), CD004250. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004250.pub5
- 2022Villanueva-Ruiz et al. (2022). Effectiveness of Specific Neck Exercise for Nonspecific Neck Pain; Usefulness of Strategies for Patient Selection and Tailored Exercise-A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Physical therapy, 102(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab259
- 2025Reynolds et al. (2025). Manual physical therapy for neck disorders: an umbrella review. The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 33(1), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2024.2425788
- 2025Chacko et al. (2025). Manual therapy with exercise for neck pain. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 12(12), CD011225. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011225.pub2
- 2011Aas et al. (2011). Workplace interventions for neck pain in workers. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011(4), CD008160. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008160.pub2
- 2020Stieven et al. (2020). Dry Needling Combined With Guideline-Based Physical Therapy Provides No Added Benefit in the Management of Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 50(8), 447-454. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2020.9389
- 2020Swain et al. (2020). No consensus on causality of spine postures or physical exposure and low back pain: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Journal of biomechanics, 102, 109312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.08.006
Mapped to this pattern
- NDI
Neck Disability Index
neck-related disability · 10 items · 5 min
- OMPSQ-SF
Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire - Short Form
psychosocial risk of prolonged disability · 10 items · 5 min
- BQ
Bournemouth Questionnaire
biopsychosocial outcome, short form · 7 items · 3 min
- CNFDS
Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale
neck-related functional disability · 15 items · 5 min
- NPDS
Neck Pain and Disability Scale
neck pain and disability · 20 items · 6 min
- STarT MSK
STarT Musculoskeletal Tool
risk stratification across MSK regions · 10 items · 3 min
Generic measures that also apply
- Borg RPE
Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (6-20)
perceived exertion · 1 items · 1 min
- GROC
Global Rating of Change Scale
perceived change since baseline · 1 items · 1 min
- NPRS
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
pain intensity · 1 items · 1 min
- PGIC
Patient Global Impression of Change
perceived change since baseline · 1 items · 1 min
- PSFS
Patient-Specific Functional Scale
patient-generated function · 3 items · 2 min
- SANE
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation
patient-rated function as a percentage of normal · 1 items · 1 min
- VAS
Visual Analogue Scale
pain intensity · 1 items · 1 min
- Borg CR10
Borg Category Ratio 10 Scale
perceived exertion or symptom intensity, ratio scale · 1 items · 1 min
- GAS
Goal Attainment Scaling
individualised goal achievement · 10 min
Did this page do its job?
CliniStudy is in beta. One tap is enough — it decides what gets fixed first.